What if there are body-life plans that God designed that will bring the results and impact hoped for by the best strategist? What if there are tactics in God's arsenal that will bear the fruit of vibrant, sustained, long-term health, extending Kingdom purposes here or anywhere in the world?[Paul Ford. Moving From I to We (Colorado: NavPress 2013) 184
It is easy for ministers and leaders to become so consumed with busyness and the "how" something should function that we establish training programs to get the masses of people to fit the "how" that we overlook God's gifting and unique functions of people that are already involved.
What principles are we to consider as we plan and execute our strategies? Before we can consider an answer to this question, we need to look and a painful answer. I believe that God is weary of our humanly contrived and executed plans to reach the world. He is probably weary of our scheming to fulfill His purposes through the next program from SUPER CHURCH X or EVANGELISTIC BLOG Z. Perhaps we need to re-think Ezekiel 36-37, the valley of dry bones and read the story again from the perspective of God's spirit awakening dead lethargy by Spirit anointing. With that in mind consider what the cult of data is not:
1. Do not prepare all people to do one type of task. Your "grand-church" vision should include the variety of talents and gifts within your church presently. "One-size" does not fit all and you risk loosing people for attempting to force them into ministry that does not fit their gift set.
2. Promoting the "right" strategic person for ministry can devalue other people already working. This mind-set can sabotage a ministry opportunity and discourage others from feeling like they have worth and value in your ministry vision.
3. Do not put all of your eggs into one basket. Accomplishing Kingdom purposes is not a one-size fits all approach. Recognize the value of multi-purposes and methods.
What if you could leverage God's unique giftedness of your leadership team as well as your entire congregation? How would that impact your goals and dreams? How would this information assist you in understanding why differences of opinions become crippling? What would the value of this information be worth to you in achieving Kingdom goals?
Contact Shepherds Advantage Inc at 502-607-0306 or garry.brackett@gmail.com
Offering mutal encouragement while strengthening leadership hopes in a contemporary matrix.
Friday, July 12, 2013
Wednesday, July 10, 2013
From Attractional to Incarnational
From
Attractional to Incarnational
QUESTION: “Is the Great Commission understood merely as
a mandate to get more people to come to a church service or activity?”
Traditionally, most churches have identified themselves as
places where things happen and where congregants receive religious goods and
services. As such, they produce worship services and events that attract
people. It is like a club that provides club activities for club members who in
turn rate the services they have received either by their return visits or by
their financial support.
The scorecard for this kind of attractional church is attendance and participation. This is
reflected in the income it derives from satisfied customers/club members. Since
the typical church member has spent their entire life in this kind of model it
feels perfectly normal. Leadership for this kind of model revolves around
training people to operate the business of church effectively. In many cases
the effectiveness of leaders relates to their ability to “grow” the church,
meaning of course, to improve its appeal and capacity to attract more people.
The Incarnational understanding of who the church is
declares that we are the body of Christ in the world today. Incarnational
approaches focus on the church “BEING THERE” – at home, in the street, in the
marketplace, at school, in the neighborhood – in the places where people live
their lives. Incarnational believers search for ways to connect not just to
each other but to the world beyond the church. They look for ways to help
people discover and live out their faith in the spaces they already occupy.
Back to the opening question. One thing is certain; it is
more difficult to add incarnational DNA to an attractional culture than it is
to incorporate attractional components into an incarnational approach. There is
a natural tension that this discussion creates. Saint Thomas Crookes of
Sheffield, England suggests; UP-IN-OUT! UP signals relationship with God, as in
worship. IN refers to relationship with each other, fellowship. OUT points to
the relationship with outside the church, mission to the world.
Monday, July 8, 2013
30 Questions For All Leaders
30 Questions to Ask
Yourself Before Making Major Decisions[1]
NOTE: These questions will help in every situation to bring
clarity to the real issues and to minimize the emotional impact. Leadership
demands clarity to make the tough choices under pressure. These questions are
designed to save hundreds of wasted hours of low productivity and thousands of
dollars spent needlessly. These questions can be used as a checklist.
- In one
sentence what is the real decision we are facing? What is the bottom,
bottom line?
- What
facts do we need before we can make this decision with total confidence?
- What
trends, changes, or problems are behind the need for this change? How long
will these continue to be a factor?
- Are we
dealing with a cause or symptom?
- What
does the Bible say about this situation?
- Am I
thinking about this situation with a clear head, or am I fatigued to the
point that I should not be making this decision at this time?
- What
would the ideal solution be in this situation?
- Should
we seek outside counsel in making this decision?
- What
are the hidden agendas that are “pushing” for a decision in this situation?
Why do “we” or “they” want a change? What is the source of the emotional
fuel that is driving this decision?
- If I
had to decide in the next two minutes…what decision would I make, and why?
- What
decision would I expect each of my three most respected advisors to favor
in this situation?
- Can an
overall decision in this situation be broken up into parts,
“sub-decisions” made at a few “go/no go” points along the way?
- What
are the key assumptions in our thinking that underlie the decision that we
are leaning toward? What do we assume it will really cost? What do we
assume will be its real benefits?
- Who?
What? When? Where? Why? How? How much?
- Have
we given ourselves twenty-four hours to let this decision settle in our
minds?
- What
differences will this decision make a year from now? Five years? Twenty
years? A hundred years?
- Is
this decision consistent with our values in the past, or does it mark a
change in direction or standards?
- How
will this decision affect our overall Master Plan? Will it sidetrack us?
- Will
this decision help maximize our key strengths?
- Have
we verified what the results have been for others who have made similar
decision in similar circumstances? Have we checked this thoroughly?
- How do
we really feel about his decision?
- Is
this the decision that we would make if our budget was twice as large as
it is? Half as large? Five times as large? One-tenth as large? Is it the
same decision we would make if we had twice as many staff members? Half as
many?
- What
would happen if we did not carry out this decision?
- If we
did not carry it out, what would be the best three alternative decisions?
- Is
this the best timing for carrying out this decision? If not, why not? And
when?
- Is
this decision truly appropriate in scope and size to the situation we
face? Are we possibly hunting an elephant with a BB gun, or a rabbit with
a cannon?
- As I
pray about this decision, and look at it from God’s perspective, do I have
a sense of peace about it?
- How do
our families feel about this decision? How will it affect them?
- What
questions still linger in our minds? What aspects of the situation will
not be resolved or solved by this decision?
- Should
we write a policy about this decision to guide us in similar situations in
the future?
Prepared by: Dr Garry L.
Brackett
Shepherds Advantage Inc.
[1]
Bobb Biehl & Tedd W. Engstrom. Increasing
Your Boardroom Confidence. (Questar: Sisters, Oregon) 1988.
Monday, July 1, 2013
Five Things I Want To Give You
Five
Things That I Want To Give You!
1.
Cultivate a devotional relationship
with Christ Jesus!
a.
Set a time and place
b.
Be creative in your devotional
material
c.
Learn to listen for God’s voice
d.
Journal
2.
Cultivate a “LEARNERS HEART”
a.
You don’t know it all
b.
Learn from others
c.
Listen to others
d.
APPLY!
3.
Develop a “TEACHABLE SPIRIT”
a.
Get rid of arrogance
b.
God gives GRACE to the humble – James
4:6
c.
Allow someone on your “front porch”
4.
Develop a “LIFE MISSION” Statement
a.
Who am I?
b.
Where am I going?
c.
What are my dreams for God?
d.
ILL. – I want to preach Christ to as
many as I can, as long as I can, in as many places as I can, and as often I as
can.
5.
Become a “LIFE-LEARNER”
a.
Do not turn your nose at education?
b.
Ignorance is expensive!
c.
Education is always examined on a
resume’
d.
If you do not pursue formal education
then you must demonstrate how you improve your skill-set.
e.
NOBODY HIRES LAZINESS!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)